<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Securism Blog &#187; windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.securism.com/tag/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.securism.com</link>
	<description>Simple Security.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No WPA2 With Windows Wireless Zero Config??</title>
		<link>http://blog.securism.com/2009/06/no-wpa2-with-windows-wireless-zero-config/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.securism.com/2009/06/no-wpa2-with-windows-wireless-zero-config/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Janego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpa2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.securism.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow &#8211; I would never have thought that in this day and age, a major vendor like Microsoft wouldn&#8217;t fully implement a spec.  However, in the case of WPA2 it looks like that they did exactly that &#8211; at least until 2005. BUT making things more interesting- this was an &#8220;optional&#8221; update with XP SP2, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I would never have thought that in this day and age, a major vendor like Microsoft wouldn&#8217;t fully implement a spec.  However, in the case of WPA2 it looks like that they did exactly that &#8211; at least until 2005.</p>
<p>BUT making things more interesting- this was an &#8220;optional&#8221; update with XP SP2, until it was finally rolled into XP SP3.  There is a hotfix for XP SP2 machines in order to support WPA2 &#8211; <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=662BB74D-E7C1-48D6-95EE-1459234F4483&amp;displaylang=en">KB 893357.</a></p>
<p>WPA2/AES didnt&#8217; really become widely implemented until 2006, but it was in the 802.11i spec that introduced WPA in 2004.  For a major vendor like MS to not implement it is pretty crazy.  But then again I, as a wireless security professional, didn&#8217;t setup a WPA2/AES network in my home until last month.  So maybe they were onto something.</p>
<p>Anyways, if you&#8217;re using XPSP2 and a WPA2 network &#8211; you need the hotfix, or XPSP3+.  Good luck out there!  I really recommend moving to WPA2/AES, especially considering the improvements in the Nvidia CUDA drivers that are allowing TKIP to be broken in an increasingly short amount of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.securism.com/2009/06/no-wpa2-with-windows-wireless-zero-config/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
